Comments for The Stone Roses, Second Coming

It took five looong years, and its pretty mediocre. It took almost as long for me to access this bloody page.

Get out of here. The second album's a killer !!

Here's an interesting note: The Stone Roses took longer to produce their second album than it did to produce the Atomic Bomb. FThe second album is simply brilliant. Definitly worth the wait. They are indeed THE GREATEST BAND IN THE WORLD.

Here's an interesting note: The Stone Roses took longer to produce their second album than it did to produce the Atomic Bomb. FThe second album is simply brilliant. Definitly worth the wait. They are indeed THE GREATEST BAND IN THE WORLD.

Certainly not as good as the first album, or even the B-sides album (Turns Into Stone)... and yet, it's still a very good piece of work. Only about 2 bad songs on it. But worth the wait? Naaaahhh.

"Tears" makes the earth begin to move, and "Daybreak" is an undescribable experience. Thatīs enough to make Second Coming the best event in 1994, and one af the best ever. Thank you John!

Watch them take over the world. THE TIME IS NOW!

The album is very good indeed, it does however need to be listened to quite a lot before you can sit down and say this is a really clever piece of rock music. Maybe the listener needs to be over thirty years old to recognise all the influences, Ten times more subtle than OASIS. Dave the WIZ. Comments welcome

Garbage. Get this crap out of here. The LEAST you'd expect after 5 years would be a half-decent album. Poor written lyrics and general tunelessness kill this one...sorry, I'll stick to Oasis.

One of the greatest albums ever Some of the best cliqued guitar playing ever Reni was under used mind Is it just me or ians vocals strained on tears still an amazing song THEY ARE TRULLY GODS

Pretty good, but perhaps not worth the five-year wait. Thefirst album was certainly better...oh well...